Antipsychotic prescribing and drug-related readmissions in multimorbid older inpatients: a post-hoc analysis of the OPERAM population.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on characteristics associated with antipsychotic use in multimorbid older adults. AIM: Primary: to identify patient characteristics associated with antipsychotic prescribing in a multimorbid population of older inpatients with polypharmacy. Secondary: (1) to observe if antipsychotics use during an index hospitalisation was associated with a drug related admission (DRA) within one year, and (2) to describe these cases of antipsychotic-related readmissions. METHOD: This was a secondary analysis of the OPERAM randomized controlled trial. Multivariate analysis assessed the association between characteristics and comorbidities with antipsychotic use. An expert team assessed DRA occurring during the one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Antipsychotics were prescribed to 5.5% (n = 110) patients upon admission while 7.7% (n = 154) inpatients received antipsychotics at any time (i.e. upon admission, during hospitalisation, and/or at discharge). The most frequently prescribed antipsychotics were quetiapine (n = 152), haloperidol (n = 48) and risperidone (n = 22). Antipsychotic prescribing was associated with dementia (OR = 3.7 95%CI[2.2;6.2]), psychosis (OR = 26.2 [7.4;92.8]), delirium (OR = 6.4 [3.8;10.8]), mood disorders (OR = 2.6 [1.6;4.1]),  ≥ 15 drugs a day (OR = 1.7 [1.1;2.6]), functional dependency (Activities of Daily Living score < 50/100) (OR = 3.9 [2.5;6.1]) and < 2 units of alcohol per week (OR = 2.2 [1.4;3.6]). DRA occurred in 458 patients (22.8%) within one year. Antipsychotic prescribing at any time was not associated with DRA (OR = 1.0 [0.3;3.9]) however contributed to 8 DRAs, including 3 falls. CONCLUSION: In this European multimorbid polymedicated older inpatients, antipsychotics were infrequently prescribed, most often at low dosage. Besides neuro-psychiatric symptoms, risk factors for inhospital antipsychotic prescribing were lower functional status and polymedication.

Hospital physicians' and older patients' agreement with individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations in a clinical trial setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of hospital physicians and older patients with individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations from a pharmacotherapy team. METHODS: This study was embedded within a large European, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial examining the effect of a structured medication review on drug-related hospital admissions in multimorbid (≥ 3 chronic conditions) older people (≥ 70 years) with polypharmacy (≥ 5 chronic medications), called OPERAM. Data from the Dutch intervention arm of this trial were used for this study. Medication review was performed jointly by a physician and pharmacist (i.e. pharmacotherapy team) supported by a Clinical Decision Support System with integrated STOPP/START criteria. Individualised STOPP/START-based medication optimisation recommendations were discussed with patients and attending hospital physicians. RESULTS: 139 patients were included, mean (SD) age 78.3 (5.1) years, 47% male and median (IQR) number of medications at admission 11 (9-14). In total, 371 recommendations were discussed with patients and physicians, overall agreement was 61.6% for STOPP and 60.7% for START recommendations. Highest agreement was found for initiation of osteoporosis agents and discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors (both 74%). Factors associated with higher agreement in multivariate analysis were: female gender (+ 17.1% [3.7; 30.4]), ≥ 1 falls in the past year (+ 15.0% [1.5; 28.5]) and renal impairment i.e. eGFR 30-50 ml/min/1.73 m2; (+ 18.0% [2.0; 34.0]). The main reason for disagreement (40%) was patients' reluctance to discontinue or initiate medication. CONCLUSION: Better patient and physician education regarding the benefit/risk balance of pharmacotherapy, in addition to more precise and up-to-date medical records to avoid irrelevant recommendations, will likely result in higher adherence with future pharmacotherapy optimisation recommendations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration Number NCT02986425.

Orthostatic hypotension and associated conditions in geriatric inpatients.

Screening of orthostatic hypotension (OH) was performed in 285 patients aged 75  years. Current drugs, reasons for admission, geriatric syndromes, and confounding medical conditions were collected. Patients with OH (n = 116, 41%) as compared to those without OH (n = 169) more frequently (P < 0.01) presented falls in the last 6  months (62 vs. 40%, P < 0.001), a fall as the reason for the current admission (49 vs. 26%, P < 0.001), feeling of fainting (20 vs. 6%, P = 0.002), syncope (29 vs. 4%, P < 0.001) or functional decline (71 vs. 47%, P = 0.012). No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of age (85 ± 5 vs. 84 ± 4  years), gender (59 vs. 50% female), common geriatric conditions (e.g. malnutrition 46 vs. 58%, dementia 22 vs. 26%), comorbidity or confounding conditions (dehydration 28 vs. 30%, sepsis 2 vs. 6%). No difference was detected in the use of drugs with psychotropic cardiovascular or diuretic effect, or in their associations. Orthostatic hypotension is frequent upon hospital admission and should be screened, particularly in geriatric fallers. This absence of relation between OH and drugs use suggests that non-pharmacological interventions should be first attempted in older inpatients with OH before deciding to reduce or withdraw useful drugs.

[Prescribing inappropriate medication: the new STOPP/START criteria]. / Prescription médicamenteuse inappropriée: les nouveaux critères STOPP/START.

Prescribing inappropriate medication (PIM) is a common public health problem. Mainly due to associated adverse drugs events (ADE), it results in major morbidity and mortality, as well as increased healthcare utilization. For a long time, the systematic review of medications prescribed appeared as a solution for limiting PIM and the ADE associated with such prescriptions. With this aim and since 2008, the list of STOPP-START criteria has appeared as attractive in its design, as well as logical and easy to use. The initial version has just been updated and improved. After having detailed all improvements provided to the 2008 version, we present the result of its adaptation into French language by a group of French-speaking expert from Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland.

Views of general practitioners on the use of STOPP&START in primary care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment) criteria aim at detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. The objective was to explore general practitioners' (GPs) perceptions regarding the use of the STOPP&START tool in their practice. DESIGN: We conducted three focus groups which were conveniently sampled. Vignettes with clinical cases were provided for discussion as well as a full version of the STOPP&START tool. Knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of the tool and its implementation were discussed. Two researchers independently performed content analysis, classifying quotes and creating new categories for emerging themes. RESULTS: Discussions highlighted incentives (e.g. systematic procedure for medication review) and barriers (e.g. time-consuming application) influencing the use of STOPP&START in primary care. Usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the tool were also questioned. Another important category emerging from the content analysis was the projected use of the tool. The GPs imagined key elements for the implementation in daily practice: computerized clinical decision support system, education, and multidisciplinary collaborations, especially at care transitions and in nursing homes. CONCLUSION: Despite variables views on the usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of STOPP&START, GPs suggest the implementation of this tool in primary care within computerized clinical decision support systems, through education, and used as part of multidisciplinary collaborations.

Reduction of potentially inappropriate medications using the STOPP criteria in frail older inpatients: a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions may provide an opportunity to discontinue potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older patients. Little is known about the effect of using the Screening Tool of Older People's potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) in this context. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that specific STOPP recommendations from an inpatient geriatric consultation team (IGCT) to the hospital physician leads to reductions in PIMs for patients at discharge. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled study in 146 frail inpatients (in 2011). The intervention consisted of STOPP recommendations made by the IGCT to ward physicians to discontinue PIMs, in addition to the standard geriatric advice. RESULTS: Intervention (n = 74) and control (n = 72) groups were similar in terms of patient characteristics (median age 85 years; median number of daily drugs, seven) and PIM distribution (68 and 57 PIMs in 53 and 51 % of patients, respectively). At discharge, the reduction in PIMs was twice as high for the intervention group as for the control group (39.7 and 19.3 %, respectively; p = 0.013). The proportion of patients who still had one or more PIM at discharge did not differ between groups. In the 50 patients followed-up a year later, the majority of PIMs that had been stopped during hospitalisation had not been restarted after discharge (17/28; 61 %). The clinical relevance of PIMs identified at baseline in those patients was considered major (29 %), moderate (37 %), minor (5 %), deleterious (8 %), or not assessed (11 %). Discontinuation rate was not associated with clinical importance. CONCLUSION: Specific STOPP recommendations provided to hospital physicians doubled the reduction of PIMs at discharge in frail older inpatients. To further improve the appropriateness of prescribing in older patients, clinicians should focus on the STOPP criteria that are of major clinical importance, and general practitioners should be actively involved.

Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension and relationship with drug use amongst older patients.

INTRODUCTION: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is said to be highly prevalent in older people. Drugs are often involved as causative factor. Nevertheless, few data are available about the prevalence of OH and its relationship with drugs in olders. OBJECTIVES: To review data about (i) the prevalence and characteristics of OH in older patients; and (ii) the relationship between OH and drugs. METHODS: Review of publications from Ovid (PubMed) from 1980 to May 2011 using the following key words: "orthostatic hypotension" combined with "elderly" or equivalent for the analysis of prevalence (first search) and "orthostatic hypotension" combined with "drugs" or equivalent to assess the relationship between OH and drugs (second search). RESULTS: Fifty-one publications (of which 14 with original data) were retrieved from the prevalence search, 31 for the second search (8 with original data: 7 retrospective studies and 1 prospective cohort study) and 12 reviews or experts opinions. Prevalence of OH varies according to the characteristics of the subjects, the settings of the studies, and the procedures of blood pressure measurement. In acute geriatrics units, two studies reported a prevalence of over 30% and one study mentioned that 68% of the patients presented with at least one episode during the day. OH was associated with several geriatric problems: gait disorders, balance disorders, falls, cerebral hypoperfusion, transient ischemic attacks, cognitive impairment, acute myocardial infarct and systolic hypertension. OH can also be asymptomatic or with atypical presentation: falls, gait disorders and confusion. Psychotropic agents (antipsychotics, sedatives, antidepressants), and cardiovascular drugs (antihypertensive agents, vasodilators, diuretics) were associated with OH. DISCUSSION: If the hypothesis of causality between drug treatment and OH is confirmed, the identification of the involved drugs could be of value for the prevention of OH and its complications. In this context, the Working Group Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care of the Belgian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics proposes to conduct a multicentre study to assess the prevalence of OH in Belgian acute geriatrics units and its relationship with drugs.